News
Stay updated with the latest news from GM, industry innovations, trade show participation, and new product announcements, and give you timely developments.
08 2026-09 Guangming Group Today Talks About How the Production Cost of Powder Metallurgy Compares with the Traditional Casting Process
Powder Metallurgy vs Traditional Casting: Production Cost Comparison
Key Conclusions
For small‑batch production, traditional casting delivers lower costs. For medium‑to‑large‑batch small‑and‑medium‑sized parts, powder metallurgy offers lower overall manufacturing costs. The cost competitiveness mainly depends on mold amortization, post‑processing labor hours, material utilization rate, as well as part weight and geometry — core evaluation dimensions for professional China manufacturer and factory suppliers in the metal forming industry.
04 2026-09 Guangming Group shares recommendations for Metal Injection Molding (MIM) part selection.
Core Judgement Logic: Comprehensive evaluation across six dimensions: part size & weight, structural complexity, production volume, tolerance requirements, material and cost. The more criteria met, the more suitable the part is for MIM.
Guangming Group Today Shares: What Is the Core Process Flow of Powder Metallurgy
Full process chain: Powder Preparation → Batching & Powder Mixing → Die Filling → Compression Molding (Green Compact) → Green Compact Inspection → Sintering → Sintered Part Inspection → Post‑treatment → Final Inspection & Warehousing
The MIM (Metal Injection Molding) process: Powder Preparation + Feedstock Mixing → Injection Molding → Debinding → Sintering → Post‑treatment. A separate comparison will be provided later.